Skip to content

Contact

Begin with one question worth resolving.

The channel is [email protected]. Choose a structured email below, or write in your own words. A first message needs context, not confidential evidence.

We reply within two business days.

General enquiry

Describe the record you need to defend.

The structured enquiry opens an email draft with these fields. A single entity and the decision it affects are enough to start.

  • Organization and your role:
  • The entity or decision you need to defend (one is enough):
  • Sources you fuse today (private, licensed, public):
  • Who may read which source:
  • Deployment constraints (infrastructure, jurisdiction, model policy):
  • Timeline:
Write the enquiry

Specific conversations

Use the context that fits the question.

Research collaboration

Name the research question, relevant work, proposed evaluation material and what others would need to reproduce a result.

  • Research question:
  • Your group and relevant work:
  • Evidence or evaluation material you propose:
  • What a reproducible result would require:
Write about research

Security review

Identify the proposed boundary and the questions your reviewers need answered. The review is specific to an engagement.

  • Organization and reviewer role:
  • Proposed deployment boundary:
  • Material and source classes:
  • Questions or questionnaire topics:
  • Preferred way to exchange review documents:
Start a security review

After you write

A written reply, then a bounded first record.

  1. We reply in writing to establish the entity, the decision and the source constraints.
  2. A scoping conversation fixes what can be read, by whom, and where the work can run.
  3. The first record on one entity is read together, value by value, before any wider scope is chosen.

Do not send confidential material in a first email. We agree how evidence will be exchanged after the boundary and reader clearance are understood.

Read before writing

The record, the boundary, and the questions.

Enquiry

Bring one entity you already argue about.

Send the entity, the sources you fuse to describe it today and who may read which of them. We reply with what a first record would cover and what it would need from you.

Or write to [email protected] in your own words.