Skip to content

Sectors

Six places where a value has to be defended to somebody.

Each of these is an organization fusing private information it holds with licensed feeds it pays for and public records anyone can read, and each is answerable for the result to a party entitled to disagree. Two worked cases each, with the recordkeeping rules that drive them named and cited.

sectors
Six, each with its own sources, its own regulator and its own vocabulary.
worked cases
Twelve, all fictional, each carrying a value, the document behind it and the date it was read.
regimes cited
Eighteen recordkeeping obligations, named and characterised. We certify against none of them.
what does not change
One record per real thing, a cited source per value, declared unknowns, any past state reproducible.

The worked cases

Twelve records, and the thing that went wrong in each

Every sector page carries two, deliberately different in kind: sources that disagree, two records that must not be merged, a file replayed to the day of a decision, a value a reader may not see, a source nobody has re-read, two numbers that are not the same quantity, a declaration the supplier withdrew. All of them are fictional and all of them are shaped like the ones our customers bring us.

12worked cases across six pages, each one a value, the document behind it, the date it was read and the value it was chosen over.

Pharmaceuticalsfirst caseOne company, three published development phasesA registry record, a January press release and an unrevised pipeline page described the same study differently.Sources that disagreePharmaceuticalssecond caseA figure that is true of a document nobody has opened since AugustThe enrolment figure in the brief was read from registry version 6 in August, and the registry has since posted five further versions.A source nobody has re-readFinancial servicesfirst caseTwo companies, one name, one exposure that must not be summedTwo entities in different jurisdictions carried the same trading name, a shared director and the same registered agent.Two records that must not be mergedFinancial servicessecond caseThe file replayed to nine in the morning on the day of approvalA supervisor reviewing an approval eighteen months later does not ask what the file says now.The file as it stood on the dayGovernmentfirst caseAn award file that still reads correctly three years laterBy the time an award was challenged, the supplier had moved twice, changed its registered name once, and the registry page that had been read at the time no longer existed.A past state reproducedGovernmentsecond caseOne determination, three readers, and one element that is withheldThe same case file is read by the officer who wrote it, by an inspector, and by a member of the public under a records request.A value the reader may not seeLegalfirst caseTwo completion dates, one memorandumA disclosure schedule in the deal room and a public filing stated different completion dates for the same transaction.Two documents, one factLegalsecond caseTwo custodians, one name, inside a single productionA production contained documents from two people who shared a surname and an initial, one a director of the counterparty and the other an external adviser unconnected to it.Two people who must not be mergedInsurancefirst caseOne site, two insured valuesA renewal statement of values and a mid-term endorsement gave different insured values for the same location.Two documents, one figureInsurancesecond caseTwo amounts within a few per cent of each other, measuring different thingsA claims extract and a cedant bordereau each reported an amount for the same claim, close enough that a reconciliation would have called them a rounding difference.Two numbers that are not the same quantitySupply-chain compliancefirst caseOne smelter, three spellings, four tiersThe same facility appeared in supplier declarations, a licensed shipment dataset and a national register under three spellings and two corporate names.One facility, many namesSupply-chain compliancesecond caseA declaration withdrawn in January, and the file that did not quietly changeEleven weeks after submitting a country-of-origin declaration, a tier-two supplier wrote to withdraw it and sent a replacement naming a different smelter.A source the supplier withdrew

What is the same everywhere

One kernel, six vocabularies

The sector pages differ in their sources and their regulators. They do not differ in what the record owes the person reading it.

The buyer is always the person who has to answer for it

Not the team that collects the data: the person who put a value in front of a committee, a supervisor, a court or a customs officer, and who is asked months later where it came from.

The sources always disagree

A register, a filing, a licensed dataset and a company's own page rarely agree on a date, a name or an amount. The disagreement is the work, and it is reported rather than resolved silently.

The rules always ask for reconstruction, not storage

Every regime cited on these pages asks for the same thing in different words: show that the record can be read back as it stood, with what it rested on, by somebody who was not there.

Only the vocabulary changes

A smelter, a counterparty, a program, a supplier, an insured location: one record per real thing, one cited source per value, declared unknowns, and a past state that can be reproduced.

Where the obligations come from

The primary texts, sector by sector

Each sector page names the recordkeeping and data-quality obligations its reader works under. These are the published texts behind them. Reading the text is better than relying on our summary, and none of them is a certification we claim.

The vocabulary used across these pages is defined in the glossary; the identifiers and registers readers rely on are in the standards directory; the practices are set out as methods, and the alternatives are weighed in the comparisons.

Not listed here

Intellectual property, M&A diligence, and anything else that fuses the two halves

The kernel does not know what sector it is in. It knows what a record owes a reader, and the six pages above differ only in which registers are authoritative and which regulator is reading over your shoulder.

Tell us the entity
Intellectual property

Families, assignments and oppositions across offices that spell one applicant four different ways, where the answer eventually has to survive a licensing dispute.

M&A diligence

A target described at once by a data room, a set of filings and three advisers who do not agree, against a deadline that does not move to accommodate the disagreement.

Anything that fuses the two halves

If the work is assembling a picture from private material and public record and then defending it to somebody entitled to disagree, the four guarantees are the same four guarantees.