Standards
NACE classification
The European Union's statistical classification of economic activities.
- Kind
- Vocabularies
- Steward
- Eurostat, European Commission
- Official source
- https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/nace
What it describes
NACE is the European Union's classification of economic activities used in official statistics. Its hierarchy lets statistical offices describe production activities at comparable levels across member states. A NACE code classifies an activity, usually at an establishment or statistical-unit level, rather than identifying a legal person. A multi-activity organization may require a principal activity plus additional detail in the underlying source.
Revisions change the boundaries and labels of categories, so a code without its version can mislead historical comparisons. National statistical classifications may add detail while remaining linked to NACE. A code copied from a company directory is not proof of actual current operations. Retain the source unit, version, effective period, and classification evidence when reconciling sector claims.
Structure
Hierarchical alphabetic section and numeric division, group, and class codes.
Useful for
- Compare EU economic statistics.
- Group activity records consistently.
- Map national industry classifications.
Limits
- Not an entity identifier.
- Revisions affect comparability.
- Principal activity does not describe every operation.
How it is used in practice
NACE is the activity classification of the European Union, established by a regulation so that member states report economic statistics on a common footing. National statistical offices derive national versions from it with additional detail, and business registers, employment statistics, national accounts and structural business statistics are all organized by NACE. The classification is aligned with the United Nations International Standard Industrial Classification, so that European statistics can be compared with those of other regions.
Codes run from sections, shown as letters, through divisions, groups and classes. Revision 2 has been in use since 2008, and a further revision has been adopted for use in statistics. Eurostat publishes the structure, explanatory notes and correspondence tables between versions.
A worked example
A fictional policy analyst compares the share of employment in pharmaceutical manufacturing in two member states. Each state publishes data by a national classification derived from NACE, with different levels of detail.
The analyst compares at the class level for the first state and at the group level for the second, because the second state aggregates two classes. The report says so, and shows the comparison at the common group level. The analyst also notes that one state's business register assigns codes at registration while the other reclassifies annually from survey data. The conclusion is limited accordingly: the comparison is valid at the group level for the year given, and differences below that level are not supported by the sources.
Evaluating a claim that rests on a NACE code
Check the revision and the assigning body. A code from a commercial directory is not the same kind of evidence as a code assigned by a national statistical office. Check whether the code refers to an establishment or an enterprise, since a multi-activity enterprise has a principal activity and secondary ones, and the choice affects aggregates.
Check the purpose. The classification is designed for statistics. Using it to decide whether a company falls within a regulatory definition, a funding scheme or a sanctions measure is stretching it past its design, and the legal definition in the relevant instrument will control. Keep the original code with its revision, and treat any mapping to another classification as a derived statement with a correspondence table cited.
Confusions to avoid
NACE is not a company identifier or a product list. It tells you what kind of activity a unit carries out, not who the unit is or what exactly it sells. It is also not identical to NAICS. They share concepts and ancestry, but their boundaries, labels and levels differ, and a mapping must go through published correspondences.
Finally, national extensions look like NACE codes and add digits. A code with five or six characters from a national register may not be comparable with another country's, even if both start with the same four. Record the scheme name and the country with each code.
Questions a reviewer can ask
Which revision of NACE and which national extension is in use? Who assigned the code, and at what unit level? Does the comparison hold at the level of detail the sources share? Is a correspondence table needed across revisions, and is it cited? Is the code being used for a legal or funding definition that has its own wording? Is the original code kept beside any harmonized one?
Maintenance and change
NACE is revised on a long cycle, and the move between revisions is a substantial event for every dataset that uses it. Eurostat publishes correspondence tables that link old and new classes, and the links are often one-to-many or many-to-many, so a class in one revision can split across several in the next. A time series that crosses a revision needs a stated treatment: recode with weights, restrict to classes that map one to one, or report each period in its own revision. Whichever is chosen, the report should say so and cite the table used. The same applies to national statistical offices that adopt a new revision on their own timetable, which means two countries may be on different revisions in the same year.
Related terms
Found an error on this page? See corrections for what counts as one, how to report it and the dated log.
Enquiry
Which of your sources carry NACE classification?
Tell us which sources carry it, which key the same entity some other way and who may read which. We reply with whether and how a first record would use this vocabulary.
Or write to [email protected] in your own words.